You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 24 Next »

Status at a glance:

To Reach Definition-of-Done Plan status: extension lifecycle and milestone definitions

  • Copy  Non-ISA Platform Ratification Template 
  • keep specification status spreadsheet up-to-date ( projected dates, DoD component effort sizing, DoD tasks your group needs resource help with,...)
  • Keep dashboard  Non-ISA Extensions On Deck for Freeze Milestone up-to-date
  • Develop final charter and plan with the group and send to Chairs (tech-chairs@lists.riscv.org) for approval within 4 weeks
  • Fill in DoD Plan tab in checklist and send to chairs for approval of any deliverables that don't match the defaults along with any requested waivers
  • Freeze-time preliminary POC definition approved by IC
  • Develop Rationale document and send to chairs for approval
  • Notify TSC and Chairs when you complete this milestone and include any waivers and an updated DoD spreadsheet.
  • Plan: RISCV has prioritized RVA22.  expect CLIC to possibly be ratified with RVM22 with other embedded extensions like Zfinx, new compressed, rv32e, p-extension.  So CLIC still on roadmap but probably next gen RISC-V grouping.  Continue working on issues and refining spec.
  • Hypervisor support? One simple option is CLIC doesn’t work with H?  Both CLIC and AIA are evolving.  CLIC problematic places: table read hardware vectoring.  Otherwise no real complication.  If systems have both AIA and CLIC, how would it work. Maybe don’t need to worry about it?
  • Impact of N-extension on CLIC?  Update CLIC spec to not rely on N-extension but add commentary on if N-extension is ratified how it would work with CLIC.

Charter

Specification

  • Latest Draft Fast Interrupt Specification (v0.9-draft-20211012)
    • updated mandatory reset requirements - removed nlbits, nmbits, clicintattr.mode reset requirements
  • What's next:
    • 28 outstanding issues to be addressed.  

Encoding/OpCode consistency review

  • Need to propose new CLIC CSR Registers and addresses
  • What's next: when outstanding issues are reduced, start planning for review
  • tech-chairs@lists.riscv.org - when spec is solid but not a final spec - primarily want to nail down opcode/CSR assignment and have a solid draft spec (but not a final spec ready for official Arch Review)
  • Also, to remind people of what gets reviewed (as is appropriate for a given extension), see the following list.  In addition to the extension spec, please submit information about the PoCs and about utility/efficiency (although we don't need all the gory detail - a paragraph or so for each can be fine).  For items considered to not be consequential, a sentence or so explaining why should suffice.
    • Consistency with the RISC-V architecture and philosophy
    • Documentation clarity and completeness
      • Including proper distinction between normative and non-normative text
    • Motivation and rationale for the features, instructions, and CSRs
    • Utility and efficiency (relative to existing architectural features and mechanisms)
      • Is there enough value or benefit to justify the cost of implementation
      • Is the cost in terms of area, timing, and complexity reasonable
    • Proof of Concept (PoC)
      • Software PoC to ensure feature completeness and appropriateness for intended use cases
      • Hardware PoC to demonstrate reasonable implementability
    • Inappropriate references to protected IP (i.e. covered by patents, copyright, etc.)

Architecture Tests

  • Deterministic Test plan for the fast-interrupt is available.  Discussion on-going on how to add async/undeterministic testing of interrupts.
  • YAML config needs to be created.  See info here.
  • Discussion in Arch tests group to add automation (docker?) to validate check-in so that arch-test-suite is run against sail, spike, gcc/toolchain, with versions used recorded.  So sail and spike will need to work for CLIC before CLIC tests can be added to riscv-config github.

Compilers / Toolchains

GCC and Binutils

  • No new instructions are added.  Needs to be aware CSR names?  Need to choose arch string like ziclic

LLVM

  • No new instructions are added.  Needs to be aware of CSR names? 

Simulators

Though all listed under "simulators", these are actually a collection of formal model / virtual machine / architectural simulators / DV simulators etc.

SAIL

  • TBD - Waiver until SAIL privilege model is completed?  e.g. add CLIC support to OS like Zephyr.
  • which github? https://github.com/riscv/sail-riscv is now the official location

Spike

  • TBD

riscvOVPSimPlus

QEMU

Proof-of-Concept implementations

Hardware

Project NameBase ArchitectureLevel of implementationNotes
area-optimized coreRV32/64

RTL simulation, FPGA Implementation, Synthesis

closed / commercial source   https://www.seagate.com/innovation/risc-v/
high-performance coreRV32RTL simulation, FPGA Implementation, Synthesisclosed / commercial source   https://www.seagate.com/innovation/risc-v/




















Software

Project/MaintainerDescription






ABI Extensions (no new ABI required)

  • Regular C function that save/restores all caller-save registers
  • Inline handler gcc interrupt attribute to always callee-save every register (save as you go)
  • EABI Task Group - improve interrupt latency by reducing the number of caller-save registers
  • No labels