RISC-V International
All extensions shall go through the Opcode and Consistency Review before progressing to the Freeze milestone as specified in the Definition of Done Policy
- This is a very preliminary list of the extensions up for review and is roughly in the order of how they will be completed.
- I will update this soon and add more information - I just wanted to get this started.
- Typically we will be performing several reviews in parallel.
| TG/FT | Board Priority | Fast Track | Contact | Extension | Sub Extensions | Status | Comment |
| BitManip | Yes | No | Ken Dockser | B | Zba, Zbb, Zbc, Zbs | complete (except for doc updates) | |
| BitManip | (Yes) | No | Ken Dockser | B | (Scalar Crypto required instructions) Zbk? | started | |
| TEE | Yes | No | Joe Xie | ePMP | started | ||
| Crypto | Yes | No | Ben Marshall | K | (Scalar) | started | Should we include the required bitManip instructions in this review? |
| Virtual Memory | Yes | Yes | Dan Lustig | ? | Zsn | NAPOT Translation Contiguity | |
| Privileged | No | Yes | Greg Favor | Sstc | hypervisor? Sys? | stimecmp / vstimecmp | |
| TEE and J | No | No | Adam Zabrocki | J | Pointer Masking | ||
| Zfinx | No | No | Tariq Kurd | Zfinx | Zfinx | ||
| Code Size Reduction | No | No | Tariq Kurd | ? | push/pop | Spec not ready for review. I let them know we will do an early review. | |
| Debug | No | No | Tim Newsome | Debug | Built on top of ratified 0.3 spec | ||
- Contact Opcode and Consistency Review at: tech-opcode-and-consistency-review@lists.riscv.org
- Use the above address to submit a specification for review.
- Join the list: tech-opcode-and-consistency-review+subscribe@lists.riscv.org
- View past posts and other information at: https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-opcode-and-consistency-review
Overview
Content Tools